![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Why is it that if you don't like the idea of a female character on Supernatural suddenly people are accusing you of being reactionary, or anti-feminist, or stupid because you haven't given them a chance? I don't think that just because a character is female they're automatically bad, I think that these characters are bad ideas right from the start. Doesn't ANYBODY remember when Jo was Alex and that hideous 'journal' of hers was published? Or that Jo's breakdown could almost have been exchanged for Ruby's and probably started the same way as Bela's? I think these characters are bad concepts, and that wouldn't change if they were male characters. It isn't a reaction against OMG GIRLS, it's a reaction against CRAP WRITING. I know I'm beating my head against a brick wall expecting quality from Supernatural out of the gate but dammit, I like the show and there's a groove in this brick wall waiting for me.
Green Queen
Green Queen
